OPCW |
Conference of the States Parties |
|||
|
Third Session |
C-III/NAT.2 |
|||
|
16 - 20 November 1998 |
28 May 1998 |
|||
|
Original: ENGLISH |
||||
SWEDEN
REGIONAL SEMINAR TO PROMOTE AND FACILITATE RATIFICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION IN STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN, 15 – 16 APRIL 1998
1. Wishing to assist in universalising the Chemical
Weapons Convention, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden hosted a regional
seminar for the Baltic States, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, and Ukraine
which took place in Stockholm
15 to 16 April 1998. Participants had been invited from National Authorities,
ministries or governmental offices which have a decisive role in the implementation
of the Chemical Weapons Convention in their respective countries. The purpose
of the seminar was to provide the participants with information that could
assist them in the implementation of the undertakings under the Convention.
It also intended to provide a forum for the exchange of experience gained
and for discussion of practical ways to solve the many tasks facing a newly
established National Authority.
2. The seminar was organised in co-operation with the Swedish National Authority and the Defence Research Establishment and with active support from the OPCW. In addition, representatives from the National Authorities of Denmark, Finland and Norway attending the seminar, shared their experience with regard to preparations for entry into force and the early stages of implementation of the convention.
3. In his opening remarks, Ambassador Johan Nordenfelt
stressed the importance Sweden attaches to a universal adherence to the
Chemical Weapons Convention, including the realisation of its objectives
also in its own geopolitical area. The Convention, calling for the elimination
of a whole class of weapons of
mass-destruction under a unique verification regime, provides an effective
instrument for building confidence and increased security to all States
Parties. Its ground-breaking verification regime will serve as a model for
future disarmament treaties and the Convention will be a useful basis for
peaceful co-operation in the field of chemical technology.
4. Mr Hassan Mashhadi, Head of the Emergency Assistance
Branch of the OPCW, introduced the Chemical Weapons Convention, including
provisions for assistance and co-operation under the Convention. He also
provided very useful guidance relating to setting up a National Authority
and an overview of its tasks. This was followed by a presentation of the
Swedish National Authority by its director,
Ms Anmmarie Lau-Eriksson. The obligations of a State Party and the national
legislation
needed to implement the Convention and to fulfil its obligations were presented by Ms Lisa Tabassi from the Legal Division of the OPCW. Mr Bertil Ahnborg from the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Mr Klaus Spöhr from the Danish National Authority gave presentations on how, in practical terms, the legislative requirements had been fulfilled in their respective countries.
5. On the second day Dr Johan Santesson, Head of the
Assistance and Protection Branch of the OPCW, accounted for the different
declaration requirements under the Convention and gave insightful practical
advice on how to identify declarable activities and to carry out the collection
of the data required. Mr Harald Schötz from the Norwegian National
Authority made a helpful presentation based on practical experience on collecting
and processing data for chemical industry declarations. The importance of
the good working relationship that had been established between the Swedish
National Authority and the chemical industry in Sweden was stressed by
Mr Owe Fredholm, President of the Association of Swedish Chemical Industries.
Sharing her experience in connection with routine inspections at schedule
1 and 2 facilities, Dr Britt Malmelin from VERIFIN, which also serves as
the Finnish National Authority, made a presentation on the requirements
of receiving and cooperating effectively with OPCW inspection teams and
the substantial amount of planning needed in this context. Dr Per Runn from
the Defence Research Establishment of Sweden concluded the presentations
by giving an overview of the regime for Challenge Inspections.
6. Throughout the seminar all participants exchanged views on different aspects of the implementation and had the opportunity to present and discuss specific subjects that had arisen in their own work. It is hoped that the seminar will also serve as a basis for a continued exchange of practical experience and support between the participants representing National Authorities in the region.
- - - o - - -