National Papers
First Review Conference

To speed uploading, some of the documents in this database, submitted as hard copies by the States Parties to the Chemical Weapons Convention at the First Review Conference of the Chemical Weapons Convention, have been scanned using optical character recognition software and may, as a result, contain occasional typographic errors. These will be rectified in due course.

RC-1/NAT.1: People’s Republic Of China. Position Paper.
RC-1/NAT.2: The People’s Republic Of China. Report On The Implementation Of The Chemical Weapons Convention In China
RC-1/NAT.3: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. National Implementation of the Chemical Weapons Convention
RC-1/NAT.4: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Declarations Of National Protective Programmes Under Article X
RC-1/NAT.5: The Swiss Confederation. Making The Chemical Weapons Convention Work: The Swiss Contribution
RC-1/NAT.6: Japan. Chemical Weapons Convention Review Conference: Implementing The Convention. Industry Issues
RC-1/NAT.7: Japan. Chemical Weapons Convention Review Conference: Abandoned Chemical Weapons In China
RC-1/NAT.8: Japan. Chemical Weapons Convention Review Conference. Strengthening The Role Of The Chemical Weapons Convention
RC-1/NAT.9: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The Changing Face Of The Chemical Industry: Implications For The Chemical Weapons Convention
RC-1/NAT.10: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The Importance Of Sampling And Analysis In The Chemical Weapons Convention
RC-1/NAT.11: Republic of Bulgaria. National Measures For Implementation Of The Chemical Weapons Convention
RC-1/NAT.12: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The Role Of Export Controls In The Implementation Of The Chemical Weapons Convention
RC-1/NAT.13: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Article IX Of The Chemical Weapons Convention: Aspects Of Compliance
RC-1/NAT.14: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The Role of CAS Numbers In The Context Of The Chemical Weapons Convention
RC-1/NAT.15: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The Treatment Of Salts Of Scheduled Chemicals Within The Schedules To The Chemical Weapons Convention
RC-1/NAT.16: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The Comprehensive Nature Of The Chemical Weapons Convention With Respect To Verification And National Implementation Measures
RC-1/NAT.17: The Republic of Korea. Recent Developments Of Chemical Technology And The Comprehensiveness Of The Chemical Weapons Convention
RC-1/NAT.18: The Republic of Korea. Promoting Universality Of The Chemical Weapons Convention
RC-1/NAT.19: The Republic of Korea. Enhancing The Efficiency And Effectiveness Of Article VI Inspections Focusing On Schedule 3 Chemicals And DOC/PSF Facilities
RC-1/NAT.20: The Federal Republic Of Germany. The Role And Importance Of Transparency
RC-1/NAT.21: The Hellenic Republic On Behalf Of The European Union. Challenge Inspections: Views Of The European Union
RC-1/NAT.22: The Federal Republic Of Germany. Germany's Experience With The Chemical Weapons Convention Since It Entered Into Force In April 1997
RC-1/NAT.23: The Italian Republic. Issues Related To Industrial Inspections
RC-1/NAT.24: The Republic Of Cuba. Methods Adopted By The Republic Of Cuba To Ensure Compliance With The Provisions Of The Chemical Weapons Convention
RC-1/NAT.25: Romania. Eliminating The Discrepancies Among Declarations On Transfers Of Scheduled Chemicals
RC-1/NAT.26: The Republic Of Finland. The Designated Laboratories Of The Opcw Current Situation And Future Role
RC-1/NAT.27: The Kingdom Of Sweden. National Implementation Of The Chemical Weapons Convention
RC-1/NAT.28: The Kingdom Of Sweden. Technological Development And Industry Inspections

RC-1/NAT.29: Australia. Australia’s Experience In Tracking Systems For International Trade In Chemicals Listed In The Chemical Weapons Convention’s Schedules Of Chemicals